Sunday, January 15, 2012

The Long And Short Of Investing In Natural Gas | Commodities ...

?Man, this investment is painful? and ?NatGas is feeling like paper cuts today??are two quotes from recent conversations I?ve had with a friend and investor who happens to have a position in Natural Gas futures and its related index fund (UNG). ?

My response to his concerns was to ensure his position was ?right-sized? and that he look at it as a longer term investment. And although I think I gave him prudent ?made-to-order? advice, I found my myself thinking about?the?charts and the corresponding technical indicators. I knew Natural Gas had been in a horrid bear market, but with all the ?yelping,? the contrarian in me said natural gas needed a closer look.

Well, here?s the breakdown: During the early-mid 1990s, the natural gas spot price?was moving in fits and starts? base-building, per se. But then came the blow-off boom of the mid-to-late 90s. And with the benefit of hindsight, who are we kidding, the magnetic pull higher from?the?mind-trip exuberance far outweighed any early technical developments.

Natural gas rose from a little over $1 in the 1990s?to $15 in late 2005. And, as we are all?aware, bubbles have a knack for popping? and the ?pop??usually doesn?t?end well. Since those bullish days of 2005, it?s been all downhill.

Natural gas closed at $2.78 on Wednesday, its lowest close in 2 1/2 years. And, before that, you?d have to go back 10 years to find a lower close.?Fortunately (or unfortunately)?for my friend, he got in at the equivilent spot price of 3 to 4 bucks? but this doesn?t make the drop any easier to swallow. ?

At current prices, every 2 to 3 cents is a percent, and the losses can add up fast in futures or related funds. Furthermore, this is precisely why both short- and long-term investors should be patient and wait for a technical trend change. Understanding?of time and?confidence in price?(plus a?sell stop!)?puts the investor in charge? and limits excessive worry. So, let?s go to the charts.?

Technically speaking, they are brutal. And, quite frankly, hard to look at. I?m not sure that I can say with any confidence that the bear market will end soon. However, I can say that?when applying DeMark analysis to?the weekly charts, natural gas has recorded a DeMark 9 buy setup and is on the first bar of four where we could expect a reaction. Although this doesn?t guarantee a near-term bounce, I would expect some relative strength sometime in the next few weeks.



However, it was the monthly charts (below)?that caught my attention. Although the charts look brutal and have not started to form a bottom (maybe the weekly setup will assist to that end?), there is a monthly DeMark setup playing out that looks likely to record in March. Currently on bar 7, we will need a lower low than this month in February or March to perfect. This would set the stage for a nice bounce. A healthy bounce? Not so sure. But?watching the technicals as this unfolds will be key?for investors to get?in at?a lower risk?price and, furthermore, to know?when and where to exit.?

As it?stands now, the gap at 3.30 and resistance around 3.80 look like magnet areas that may come into play sometime this year. But a lot will depend on price developments over the coming months (i.e., shape of bottom and just how low the price ultimately drops to). Other potential pricing influences include political platforms/announcements and dollar weakness/strength.?

Note that the current price is nearing very long-term support on 20-year chart. Related stocks include Chesapeake Energy (CHK) and bigger, more diverse energy players like BP p.l.c. (BP) and ExxonMobil (XOM). All are holdings in the popular index fund Select Sector-Energy (XLE).

Happy investing.

Editor's Note: Andrew Nyquist is an independent investor based in the Minneapolis area. This article originally appeared on his investing and economics site, See It Market. His writings also appear on Minyanville's blog community.

Twitter: @andrewnyquist

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Source: http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/natural-gas-natgas-investing-in-gas/1/12/2012/id/38828

tucson weather peyton hillis cl p cl p andy rooney andy rooney groupon ipo

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.